We cannot think of a more glaringly obvious metaphor for austerity than a conference stage set literally falling apart during the Prime Minister’s address. Forget the coughing, spluttering and plagiarism. Theresa May’s Conservative Party Conference speech was a live-action panic attack, and a giant metaphor for the slow death of neoliberalism. May is toast. A political zombie. Her days are numbered. And she knows it.
Prime Minister, Theresa May got-off lightly in the press coverage of the slow-motion car-crash that was her address at the Conservative Party Conference last week.
She was lucky that so many publications missed the point, somewhat.
Forget the cough, and the plagiarising of one of the greatest political series of recent years, that painful hour and four minutes of mealy mouthed promises wasn’t a cold, it was a full-on panic attack.
Forget that she was handed a P45 form (a letter given to an employee upon the termination of their employment) by protester and comedian, Simon Brodkin, because less than a month prior to Mr Brodkin’s delivery May was the recipient of an even more urgent and damning letter.
Shadow business minister Bill Esterson, wrote to her and is requesting the release of a shelved Treasury Report into RBS’ Global Restructuring Group (GRG) reportedly providing undeniable evidence of systematic asset stripping of thousands of British businesses.
My letter to the Prime Minister calling for publication of report about RBS treatment of 1,000s of businesses and need for judge led enquiry pic.twitter.com/2P2z27heJL
— Bill Esterson (@Bill_Esterson) September 14, 2017
The Tories have been continually trying to bury the details of the report, but the groundswell for justice is unmoved by their attempts.
The wheels have come off the proverbial RBS / GRG wagon and May knows it. This is another thing on the spiralling ‘to do’ list. It’s no surprise that in a big set piece, a control freak – out of control – chokes on almost every word.
For me, though, the defining moment was neither in May’s cough, nor her blatant plagiarism. It was that sign behind her.
I cannot think of a more glaringly obvious metaphor for austerity than a conference stage set literally falling apart behind her as May made her case for a second term.
As the Prime Minister spluttered her way through an entirely unconvincing speech about building a country that works for everyone, commentators have not picked up that it’s an oddly revealing theme in itself.
Actually the subject of the speech is a passive admission from the Tories that Britain has not in fact, been working for everyone up until now.
The set falling apart is a micro insight into the macro problem.
That moment resembled something out of Yes, Prime Minister, or In The Thick Of It, best summed up by the character Stewart Pearson:
“I’ve spent ten years detoxifying this party. It’s been a bit like renovating an old, old house, yeah? You can take out a sexist beam here, a callous window there, replace the odd homophobic roof tile.
“But after a while you realise that this renovation is doomed. Because the foundations are built on what I can only describe as a solid bed of c*nts”.
If you listened very carefully after the speech, that discordant shuffling noise wasn’t rebels circling the wagons, it was May’s flunkies rearranging deck-chairs on the proverbial Titanic before plummeting into the icy political and economic abyss.
The economically illiterate Tories are approaching a record they’d rather not be pinned with: Under May and Cameron’s leadership, Britain’s inequality is set to exceed levels not seen since Thatcher was at the helm.
Wages are stagnant. Workers have experienced a 10% decline over the last 13 years. And according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, wages are likely to decline even further between now and 2021. The report is explicit that this decline is not the result of some kind of spiralling economic shock, or a hangover from the Global Financial Crisis, but the direct result of actual government policy.
The government is destroying jobs and income is declining along with it, prices are rising, and National Accounts data suggests that real household incomes per capita have declined in each of the last three quarters.
And with £12 billion having been cut from welfare, the social-safety net has left great swathes of the population entirely powerless against the forces of austerity.
The only country in Europe with worse living standards is Greece, and that’s not exactly something to write home about.
But all the Tories have to offer in response is “we need a strong economy”, but apparently crafting policy that supports domestic employment is considered far too radical an idea, so suck it up and take on more private debt, even though it is already at record highs.
And there stands Jacob Rees-Mogg, Prime Minister in waiting advocating for zero-hour contracts and even more austerity. Because if at first you don’t succeed, fail, fail again.
The system is broken. The Tories know it. May especially knows it. Her entire demeanour screamed ‘Imposter Syndrome, High Alert!’. She also knows she has to spin the state controlled RBS story so the public believe that the taxpayer-rescued bank hasn’t been working against the national interest. An impossible task.
Ironically, May and her government have more ability to affect change in a single day than most will have in a lifetime, yet they continue to rely on an ideology that totally admonishes its responsibility for the economic well-being of its constituents. And it expects people to vote for it next year?
‘You’re on your own, vote Tory’: a somewhat less alluring tagline than ‘A Britain that works for everyone.’
But at least it’s honest.
May is Prime Minister by default, having waited-in-the-wings as Home Office Minister for six years, a role she squandered. But there’s nothing like the Tories to demonstrate you needn’t have talent, or even political capital, to become PM. Who needs talent when you have entitlement?
May was MIA during the Brexit referendum, repeatedly ruling out a general election until she called one and dashed what little was left of the Tory mandate, following Cameron’s exit. The election result headlines may have been depicted as a shock landslide against the government, but the public wasn’t surprised.
Why would anyone vote for a party that makes no promises, and whose actual ideology says ‘leave it to the private sector’? The Tories don’t even believe in government, but they’re happy to drain the public purse anyway.
All while voting for austerity, claiming it is social welfare – not our elected officials – that is a drain on the system. Easier than actually working for a living. Easier to advocate for neoliberal policy while drawing a lifetime government pension.
How they expect to be elected – let alone govern – is anyone’s guess.
May entered the Brexit fray as a cooler head, the preferred remedy to Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage, but has since squandered all her good-will. She was almost nowhere to be found during the Grenfell Fire, earning a very public diss from The Queen, whose security team assessed that it could still guarantee Her Majesty’s safety while talking to the great-unwashed affected by this tragedy.
May all but refused to engage with the public over Grenfell, or any other concern, for that matter. She wouldn’t debate Corbyn all the way through the election, even though she’ll have to spend the next six months debating him in Parliament everyday, (if she keeps her job, that is). Probably because she knew her ideas couldn’t stand-up to Labour’s fully-costed policy alternative. And her few public addresses have been mealy-mouthed, buzz-word laden meaningless tosh. May is an uncomfortable mess who doesn’t buy what she is selling.
Her entire body-language screams ‘even I don’t believe me!’.
May is a political zombie. Her days are numbered. And she knows it.
Specialising in economics, technology and policy, Connelly is working on her first book and podcast series, How the World Really Works*. (*Title may be due to change). You can pre-order a copy here. #shamelessselfpromotion.
With more than a decade of experience under her belt, Claire has written for leading publications including The Australian Financial Review, The Saturday Paper, ABC, SBS, Crikey, New Matilda, VICE & others. She is the co-host of The Week In Start-Ups Australia, and features regularly as a commentator on TV and radio shows including Radio National's Download This Show, ABC's The Drum, Ten's The Project, and more.
How do you spend your days?
I am the editor-in-chief of Renegade and founder of Hello Humans, a subscription journalism experiment. I also freelance & consult for a number of publications of the editorial and commercial variety.I work from home. I am a bit of a work-hermit. I can mostly be found on the internet and at the dog park.
Why is this important to you?
Now more than ever, it is really important to make sense of the world around us. But in an age of information saturation it is becoming harder to distinguish the truth from bullshit. Part of the reason I am doing this is to help people differentiate between the truth and narratives being sold by people and organisations with vested interests.
I want to help people identify rhetorical red flags and immunise themselves against a sea of bullshit.
What drove you to focus on journalism?
I guess you could say my parents played a fairly big part in my becoming a journalist, much to their despair. Watching the news, reading the paper and listening to the radio was a compulsory activity in my household. My parents read me the paper before I could read.
Being engaged in the world around us was the way we repaid our debt to society.
They channelled the last of their politically active twenties and thirties into fostering our curiosity and distrust of authority. It wasn’t until I reached university that I fell in love with economics, politics and international relations.
Was there a particular moment you can remember that led you to this field?
The day Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzchak Rabin was assassinated, (the 4th of November 1995). I was 10. It was a weekend and I was in my winter school uniform complete with pinafor and scratchy tights. I played clarinet in the school orchestra and we were due to play at the old folks home. And I was pissed. And I said so.
The phone rang, and with tears rolling down her face, my mum turned to me and said the concert had been cancelled. Yitzhak Rabin, the Israeli Prime Minister had been killed.
I threw my stuff down and turned to get changed. But before I could my mum grabbed me firmly. I will never forget the look of disappointment on her face. She made some comment about how Rabin did not die for my convenience.
“You live in this house, you have clothes on your back and warm blankets and three square meals a day. You may not do anything with your education that we pay for, but you will be informed.”
She sat me down in front of the ABC and made me watch eight hours of assassination coverage. Little had I known the world was falling apart.
That day pretty much sealed my fate.
You can read more it here if you are interested.
What drives you professionally?
Justice. Egomania. Curiosity. And the fact there is no other profession more suited to my personality.
In your opinion what are the three biggest problems facing the developed and developing world?
Neoliberalism. Economic and social instability and insecurity. Banking fraud. Climate change. (Ok that’s four things. I never was very good at lists).
If you hadn’t become a journalist what would you have done?
My mum wishes I had studied law.
What led us to this moment in history?
We are living proof of a 30 year operation to permanently reduce the responsibility ofgovernment over the wellbeing of its constituents. You can read more about that here. (Link to neoliberalism piece).
What are the lessons we failed to learn during and since the 2008 crisis?
Austerity is a means of redistributing the profits in of productivity in which we all used to share to the world’s uber-wealthy.
The global financial crisis was one small step for man, one giant leap for the banking industry. It cemented financial crises as a permanent phenomenon and the formalisation of corporate revolution.
It signalled to the world that government exists only to support the private sector, triggering a wave of disillusionment which allowed neoliberalism to complete its task at hand: the complete and utter destruction of democracy, replacing it with a market society in which economics permeates every facet of modern life, from education to healthcare to law & order.
Even the military operates as a for-profit model, conveniently privatising any activity that sits outside the criminal justice system.
Some call the bail-outs of 2008 a failure of neo-liberalism. To the contrary, the private sector attained almost exactly what it set out to achieve: a system with no obligation to true economic recovery, that supports only profits and the corporations which generate them.
We keep voting for wealthy populist leaders thinking the knock-on-effects will put dollars in our pocket when the very opposite is true.
So long as voters continue to accept the mythic propaganda sown over the last 30 years that tax breaks & subsidies create jobs, deficits are bad, surpluses are good and that any instability is somehow the fault of the poor, our economic insecurity will only continue to increase.
Can you list some ‘baby steps’ out of the current economic mess?
A return to full employment.
A royal commission into the continuation of subprime mortgage fraud. (It didn’t go away after the GFC. In fact it was pretty much legalised).
Slash the cost of university degrees & create new pathways for the unemployed and underemployed to attain new skills and education.
Deficit spending to create infrastructure that will create the jobs of the future.
Support local agriculture.
Reduce private debt.
If you were a President / Prime Minister what would your first three pieces of policy be?
A job guarantee.
Re-introduce a price on carbon.
Legalise gay marriage.
Tell us something you have been wrong about?
I didn’t think that in 2017 that gay marriage and abortion would still be illegal in Australia.
Latest posts by Claire Connelly (see all)
- Technology is not a supplement for social policy - December 5, 2017
- Hypocritical Number 10 only takes Yemen seriously to avoid a banking inquiry - December 1, 2017
- Serfs inside the machine: Why tech is unlikely to destroy capitalism - November 29, 2017