Less than a year ago, Australia’s government and industry conspired to invent a gas crisis, claiming shortages. That decision has come back to bite both in the behind, writes editor-in-chief, Claire Connelly.
You wouldn’t know it from the way government, industry, and, let’s face it – some media outlets – characterise the so-called ‘gas crisis’, but Australia is not about to run out of one of its greatest natural resources.
“Australia has never produced more gas,” says Dr Richard Denniss, Chief Economist of the Australia Institute. “Despite record production we are not producing nearly enough to justify the enormous over investment in gas export capacity.”
In reality, the crisis is not about shortages, but of overvaluation, along with inadequate policy, a lack of coordination across state and federal governments, and inaction.
Now that the government is threatening to step in to guarantee supply, the industry seems to be changing its tune.
“After years of claiming shortages, even industry players like Santos now says there is no shortage as they fear the government might step in to help industry and consumers,” Dr Denniss told Renegade Inc.
Over the past decade the Australian gas industry spent more than $60 billion building new gas export terminals in Queensland. Those terminals were built based on the optimistic assumption that the Victorian, New South Wales and South Australian governments would approve every fracking well the gas industry wanted to build.
“After watching what fracking did to Queensland – (like say, discovering its river was flammable and bubbling with methane gas – those states have started to say no to extracting gas from under farmland, so the only ‘shortage’ is relative to the amount the industry bet they could extract,” Dr Denniss said.
Dr Denniss describes the so-called ‘crisis’ as ‘multifaceted’.
“For the gas industry, its crisis is that world prices are much lower than was assumed before $60 billion was invested in new export facilities. The customer crisis is that the domestic price of gas in Australia has risen 300% since Australian gas prices were linked to the global market. And the government isn’t even making any real tax revenue from all the exports. It’s amazing, but everyone is losing.”
Last week Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull announced a plan to cap wholesale gas export prices in a bid to counter domestic shortages and increasing retail prices.
Dr Liam Wagner, Senior Economics Lecturer at Griffith University claims the intervention is a ‘banal platitude’ that will only have a marginal effect on gas prices.
“There is no crisis,” he said.
“Australia is the second largest exporter of LNG in the world (behind Qatar),” he told Renegade Inc.
“We’ve got so much gas it’s not funny. The only shortage is of cheap gas that is easy to get.”
Dr Dennis described the principle of reserving some gas for local industry as “pretty meaningless”.
“The important question is ‘at what price can Australians access gas’,” he said. “The government doesn’t seem to have an answer to that question yet.”
Turnbull’s recent announcement in effect only guarantees security of supply.
The government has a range of powers to maintain the stability and security of the economy. Energy security is one of those vested powers. However, any additional gas reserved for domestic use, particularly during peak periods like summer is sold on an ad-hoc basis at the prevailing spot price.
LF Economics co-founder and Bubble Economics co-author, Philip Soos told Renegade Inc that governments, especially those at the state level, have the capacity to control prices – not precisely, but to certainly reduce them.
“The costs of generation have remained fairly stable leading up to the energy crisis, which is a problem caused by gas, not coal or renewables,” he said.
“Our electricity bills have doubled in the last decade due to gold plating of networks, which were mostly government owned when it occurred, then privatised, so privatisation wouldn’t get the blame. State governments could change the regulations to lower prices, but they won’t, because it is such a cash cow for them and their campaign contributors”.
“While the government can’t centrally plan prices, it could contain them within reasonable bounds via regulation, which it has intentionally failed to do.”
Dr Wagner says that if prices exceed the already extremely high market caps on the short term market, set out in the market rules, “we will be in more trouble than Flash Gordon.”
The economics lecturer said prices will be pretty much unchanged by a small amount of extra supply reservation used for domestic consumption.
Domestic use is less than a third of the total gas production in Australia. More than two thirds is for export.
“The Market Price Caps’ range from $20/GJ right up to $400/GJ, depending on whether it is during market shortages or an administered cap by the regulator,” says Dr Wagner. ‘Even if it is set at $20/GJ that is more than double what it is now.”
Dr Wagner says last week’s announcement “is just a banal platitude designed to give the appearance of doing something that will only have a marginal effect on gas prices”.
“What we don’t have is adequate energy policy,” he said. “That’s the crisis we face: a lack of co-ordination and wasted time.”
After decades of telling Australians that ‘free trade’ was good for the economy it is now pretty hard for the government to explain why, having approved all of this new gas export infrastructure, it should prevent the private sector from actually using it.
“Voters want gas to be cheap, the industry wants gas to be expensive and the government is trying to make everyone happy,” Dr Denniss says.
“It won’t end well.”
Gas used to be cheap
Prior to the commencement of LNG exports in 2015 Australia had large volumes of gas flowing around the country at extremely low prices.
“From about 2010 to 2014 gas prices in Queensland and NSW were too cheap at $2/GJ,” Dr Wagner said.
“This was due the the ramp gas scenario, where huge amounts gas were brought online to prove reserves”.
The gas was made available for sale to electricity generators and large gas users.
Once exports on the east coast began, supply for previously cheap and available gas was tightened and the price increased.
Industry has little to gain except to minimise losses
Dr Denniss says the industry has nothing to gain from the export controls except to minimise losses.
“In addition to making optimistic assumptions about the amount of gas they would be able to extract, they made very optimistic assumptions about the world price of gas,” he said. “They are losing lots of money and they would like to lose a little bit less.”
What this intervention means for household and industry isn’t yet clear because no one, including the PM has been very clear about how it would really work.
“The ‘principle’ of reserving some gas for local industry is pretty meaningless in itself”, the economist says. “The important question is: ‘at what price can Australians access gas’. The government doesn’t seem to have an answer to that question yet.”
Specialising in economics, technology and policy, Connelly is working on her first book and podcast series, How the World Really Works*. (*Title may be due to change). You can pre-order a copy here. #shamelessselfpromotion.
With more than a decade of experience under her belt, Claire has written for leading publications including The Australian Financial Review, The Saturday Paper, ABC, SBS, Crikey, New Matilda, VICE & others. She is the co-host of The Week In Start-Ups Australia, and features regularly as a commentator on TV and radio shows including Radio National's Download This Show, ABC's The Drum, Ten's The Project, and more.
How do you spend your days?
I am the editor-in-chief of Renegade and founder of Hello Humans, a subscription journalism experiment. I also freelance & consult for a number of publications of the editorial and commercial variety.I work from home. I am a bit of a work-hermit. I can mostly be found on the internet and at the dog park.
Why is this important to you?
Now more than ever, it is really important to make sense of the world around us. But in an age of information saturation it is becoming harder to distinguish the truth from bullshit. Part of the reason I am doing this is to help people differentiate between the truth and narratives being sold by people and organisations with vested interests.
I want to help people identify rhetorical red flags and immunise themselves against a sea of bullshit.
What drove you to focus on journalism?
I guess you could say my parents played a fairly big part in my becoming a journalist, much to their despair. Watching the news, reading the paper and listening to the radio was a compulsory activity in my household. My parents read me the paper before I could read.
Being engaged in the world around us was the way we repaid our debt to society.
They channelled the last of their politically active twenties and thirties into fostering our curiosity and distrust of authority. It wasn’t until I reached university that I fell in love with economics, politics and international relations.
Was there a particular moment you can remember that led you to this field?
The day Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzchak Rabin was assassinated, (the 4th of November 1995). I was 10. It was a weekend and I was in my winter school uniform complete with pinafor and scratchy tights. I played clarinet in the school orchestra and we were due to play at the old folks home. And I was pissed. And I said so.
The phone rang, and with tears rolling down her face, my mum turned to me and said the concert had been cancelled. Yitzhak Rabin, the Israeli Prime Minister had been killed.
I threw my stuff down and turned to get changed. But before I could my mum grabbed me firmly. I will never forget the look of disappointment on her face. She made some comment about how Rabin did not die for my convenience.
“You live in this house, you have clothes on your back and warm blankets and three square meals a day. You may not do anything with your education that we pay for, but you will be informed.”
She sat me down in front of the ABC and made me watch eight hours of assassination coverage. Little had I known the world was falling apart.
That day pretty much sealed my fate.
You can read more it here if you are interested.
What drives you professionally?
Justice. Egomania. Curiosity. And the fact there is no other profession more suited to my personality.
In your opinion what are the three biggest problems facing the developed and developing world?
Neoliberalism. Economic and social instability and insecurity. Banking fraud. Climate change. (Ok that’s four things. I never was very good at lists).
If you hadn’t become a journalist what would you have done?
My mum wishes I had studied law.
What led us to this moment in history?
We are living proof of a 30 year operation to permanently reduce the responsibility ofgovernment over the wellbeing of its constituents. You can read more about that here. (Link to neoliberalism piece).
What are the lessons we failed to learn during and since the 2008 crisis?
Austerity is a means of redistributing the profits in of productivity in which we all used to share to the world’s uber-wealthy.
The global financial crisis was one small step for man, one giant leap for the banking industry. It cemented financial crises as a permanent phenomenon and the formalisation of corporate revolution.
It signalled to the world that government exists only to support the private sector, triggering a wave of disillusionment which allowed neoliberalism to complete its task at hand: the complete and utter destruction of democracy, replacing it with a market society in which economics permeates every facet of modern life, from education to healthcare to law & order.
Even the military operates as a for-profit model, conveniently privatising any activity that sits outside the criminal justice system.
Some call the bail-outs of 2008 a failure of neo-liberalism. To the contrary, the private sector attained almost exactly what it set out to achieve: a system with no obligation to true economic recovery, that supports only profits and the corporations which generate them.
We keep voting for wealthy populist leaders thinking the knock-on-effects will put dollars in our pocket when the very opposite is true.
So long as voters continue to accept the mythic propaganda sown over the last 30 years that tax breaks & subsidies create jobs, deficits are bad, surpluses are good and that any instability is somehow the fault of the poor, our economic insecurity will only continue to increase.
Can you list some ‘baby steps’ out of the current economic mess?
A return to full employment.
A royal commission into the continuation of subprime mortgage fraud. (It didn’t go away after the GFC. In fact it was pretty much legalised).
Slash the cost of university degrees & create new pathways for the unemployed and underemployed to attain new skills and education.
Deficit spending to create infrastructure that will create the jobs of the future.
Support local agriculture.
Reduce private debt.
If you were a President / Prime Minister what would your first three pieces of policy be?
A job guarantee.
Re-introduce a price on carbon.
Legalise gay marriage.
Tell us something you have been wrong about?
I didn’t think that in 2017 that gay marriage and abortion would still be illegal in Australia.
Latest posts by Claire Connelly (see all)
- NATO itching for war with Russia - November 15, 2017
- Bean counters: Lost in Paradise - November 8, 2017
- Interest rate height correlation doesn’t stand up to scrutiny - November 7, 2017