Before we all start frothing at the mouth over the recent indictments by Robert Mueller over alleged US election interference by the Russians, let’s get a few things clear:

We do not yet have any evidence of any collusion with the Russian government. What we do have evidence of however, is the overwhelming influence of foreign money in US politics.

Illustration by Rachael Bolton

George Papadopoulos, former member of the foreign policy advisory panel to Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign was indicted this week for lying to the FBI, along with his colleagues Paul Manafort and Rick Gates who were charged with money laundering and failing to register as foreign agents. 

The text of the Papadopoulos indictment says that he met with a Russian professor, Joseph Mifsud of the London Academy of Diplomacy, in April 2016 who claimed to have knowledge of “thousands of emails” collected by the Kremlin that contained “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. The details of the emails remain unspecified.

In previous meetings with the FBI, Papadopoulos claimed the conversation took place before Trump’s election campaign when in fact it allegedly occurred during the campaign.

Papadopoulos claims Professor Mifsud introduced him to a Female Russian National he thought to be Putin’s niece (she wasn’t). Mifsud denies these claims.

From the New Yorker:

“According to the plea agreement, the Professor and the Female Russian National (who was not Putin’s niece) promised Papadopoulos that they would introduce him to the Russian ambassador in London. They were lying. But that’s O.K., because Papadopoulos lied, too: he reported back to the campaign that his “good friend” the Professor and “Putin’s niece” had introduced him to the Russian ambassador. A campaign supervisor praised his effort: “Great work.”

“Reading the plea deal is a bit like reading the minutes of a Politburo meeting, in which every speaker rises to report a triumph and receive a round of applause and everyone is lying. Bonuses and medals are dispensed for roads constructed or steel produced in the imagination—and the ritual is the sole point of the exercise.”

According to emails read by the Washington Post, Papadopoulos appears to have been overly eager to arrange meetings with staff within the Russian government, triggering immediate concerns within the Trump administration.

However, Papadopoulos’ own Russian professor at De Paul University, Richard Farkas, put a dampener on the allegations, claiming his former student was “simple and a zealot”, not a particularly hard-working and a person that was prone to hyperbole. (He has embellished his resume on at least three occasions).

“There’s no likelihood he could access it effectively,” Professor Farkas told NPR. “I think he probably was just embellishing.” (The professor has taught at DePaul for more than 40 years).

“I’ve been teaching about this part of the world and know people in Moscow. I don’t think I could access people at that level, not at least without really working it.”

We know that Russian influence wasn’t the only interest’s Papadopoulos was prepared to peddle: He also met with Greek and British officials, as well as a right-wing Israeli think tank.

Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and his protege Rick Gates, were indicted for money laundering and failing to register as foreign agents. The pair failed to disclose their work for former Ukrainian President, Victor Yanukovych. The charges reveal that Manafort laundered “more than $18 million” through offshore accounts while working for the corrupt former Ukrainian President and that he and Gates used the funds to purchase multi-million dollar properties in the US. Manafort then “borrowed millions of dollars in loans using these properties as collateral, thereby obtaining cash in the United States without reporting and paying taxes on the income.”

Manafort used shell corporations in Cyprus, the Seychelles, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines to launder money, hide assets and avoid tax.

The Foreign Agent Registration Act lists 211 post-Soviet “foreign principals” that have hired US lobbyists, PR and law firms to represent them (and those are just the ones we know about because they bothered to register). Of these 211, 78 were from the Ukraine, 54 from Georgia, 44 from Azerbaijan, 34 from Kazakhstan and 19 were from Uzbekistan.

Meanwhile, the Podesta Group, a Democratic lobbying firm – from which co-founder and CEO Tony Podesta stepped down this week –  acts as a lobbyist for Egypt in addition to the Brussels-based European Centre for a modern Ukraine. The pro-Russian nonprofit reportedly hired the firm to improve the image of former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych after Kremlin veteran, Gleb Pavlovsky, led his campaign to defeat in 2004, along with riots over claims of vote-rigging and the ascendency of his rival, Viktor Yushchenko.

(The firm formed in 1988 by brothers Tony and John Podesta. John would go on to chair Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, while his brother lobbied for funding).

Tony Podesta, while also one of the top financiers of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, is also a registered foreign agent of the Saudi Government which hired the group in 2015 and pays his firm $140,000 a month.

The Podesta Group was hired to counter the negative press coverage over civilian casualties from airstrikes in Yemen, its crackdown on political dissidents, including the sentencing of blogger Raif Badawi to 1000 lashes and ten years in prison for insulting Islam. It also advocated for Saudi Arabia during Shia protests after the execution of prominent peaceful dissident, Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr. The Podesta Group provided the New York Times with a Saudi commentator who defended the execution.

No conflict of interest there. Nope. Nosiree Bob!

And while Trump was elected off the back of his promise to ‘drain the swamp’, he has hired five Goldman Sachs alumnists to work in top positions inside his administration:

  • Steve Bannon, former vice president at Goldman Sachs was Trump’s former Chief Strategist.
  • Steve Mnuchin, spent 17 years at Goldman and left as Executive Vice President, member of the Management Committee, and Chief Information Officer before coming onboard as Trump’s Treasury Secretary.
  • Dina Powell, former Goldman Sachs partner joined the White House as a senior counselor for economic initiatives.
  • Attorney Jay Clayton was co-managing partner of law firm Sullivan & Cromwell’s General Practice Group and represented Goldman Sachs after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis before being appointed Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. His wife, Gretchen was a Goldman Sachs wealth management adviser.
  • And short-lived communications director Anthony Scaramucci was VP at Goldman Sachs before leaving to co-found his own investment company.

So at present, Mueller is relying on a notorious liar, a man with a long history of corruption and his equally corrupt protege to turn state’s evidence on Trump, a President with whom the three have long-standing relationships.

From what we know from the documents, nothing Papadopoulos has done so far reaches the level of criminal, let alone evidence of some kind of Russian government stitch-up.

Manafort and Gate’s actions could have been totally legal if only they had bothered to register as foreign agents and, you know, pay tax.

There has been some speculation that Papadopoulos has likely been wearing a wire for at least the last few weeks.  The expectation is that all three can be leveraged to turn state’s evidence on their employer, Donald Trump. And while I want Trump gone as much as the next guy, the grounds for his impeachment must be real.

Nothing in the documents makes any tangible connection to the Kremlin. And relying on a known liar and two embezzlers for accurate information is wishful at best.

The problem is, no one in Washington, least of all Trump, wants the state of campaign funding to change. The influence industry is already reeling at Mueller’s recent revelations. If nothing else, the Mueller investigation demonstrates that when it comes to lobbying influence the Democrats are as happy to line its pockets as the Republicans across the aisle.

It would be a truly delicious irony if these trumped-up Russian allegations become the catalyst for campaign finance reform.

Nobody really wants to drain the swamp, least of all the Democrats (which, incidentally, is how the party has totally ceded the high moral ground. It is too busy cashing cheques to address inequality and must now rely on its single-weapon of identity politics). Which is why Mueller and the US intelligence services needs this Russia investigation to succeed.

Because otherwise both parties might be forced to ban foreign donations.

And we can’t have that.

Claire Connelly

Claire Connelly

Claire Connelly is the editor-in-chief of Renegade Inc. An award-winning freelance journalist and speaker, she is the founder of Hello Humans, an experiment in subscription journalism starting at just $1 a month.

Specialising in economics, technology and policy, Connelly is working on her first book and podcast series, How the World Really Works*. (*Title may be due to change). You can pre-order a copy here. #shamelessselfpromotion.

With more than a decade of experience under her belt, Claire has written for leading publications including The Australian Financial Review, The Saturday Paper, ABC, SBS, Crikey, New Matilda, VICE & others. She is the co-host of The Week In Start-Ups Australia, and features regularly as a commentator on TV and radio shows including Radio National's Download This Show, ABC's The Drum, Ten's The Project, and more.

How do you spend your days?

I am the editor-in-chief of Renegade and founder of Hello Humans, a subscription journalism experiment. I also freelance & consult for a number of publications of the editorial and commercial variety.I work from home. I am a bit of a work-hermit. I can mostly be found on the internet and at the dog park.

Why is this important to you?

Now more than ever, it is really important to make sense of the world around us. But in an age of information saturation it is becoming harder to distinguish the truth from bullshit. Part of the reason I am doing this is to help people differentiate between the truth and narratives being sold by people and organisations with vested interests.

I want to help people identify rhetorical red flags and immunise themselves against a sea of bullshit.

What drove you to focus on journalism?

I guess you could say my parents played a fairly big part in my becoming a journalist, much to their despair. Watching the news, reading the paper and listening to the radio was a compulsory activity in my household. My parents read me the paper before I could read.

Being engaged in the world around us was the way we repaid our debt to society.

They channelled the last of their politically active twenties and thirties into fostering our curiosity and distrust of authority. It wasn’t until I reached university that I fell in love with economics, politics and international relations.

Was there a particular moment you can remember that led you to this field?

The day Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzchak Rabin was assassinated, (the 4th of November 1995). I was 10. It was a weekend and I was in my winter school uniform complete with pinafor and scratchy tights. I played clarinet in the school orchestra and we were due to play at the old folks home. And I was pissed. And I said so.

The phone rang, and with tears rolling down her face, my mum turned to me and said the concert had been cancelled. Yitzhak Rabin, the Israeli Prime Minister had been killed.

I threw my stuff down and turned to get changed. But before I could my mum grabbed me firmly. I will never forget the look of disappointment on her face. She made some comment about how Rabin did not die for my convenience.
“You live in this house, you have clothes on your back and warm blankets and three square meals a day. You may not do anything with your education that we pay for, but you will be informed.”
She sat me down in front of the ABC and made me watch eight hours of assassination coverage. Little had I known the world was falling apart.

That day pretty much sealed my fate.

You can read more it here if you are interested.

What drives you professionally?

Justice. Egomania. Curiosity. And the fact there is no other profession more suited to my personality.

In your opinion what are the three biggest problems facing the developed and developing world?

Neoliberalism. Economic and social instability and insecurity. Banking fraud. Climate change. (Ok that’s four things. I never was very good at lists).

If you hadn’t become a journalist what would you have done?

My mum wishes I had studied law.

What led us to this moment in history?

We are living proof of a 30 year operation to permanently reduce the responsibility ofgovernment over the wellbeing of its constituents. You can read more about that here. (Link to neoliberalism piece).

What are the lessons we failed to learn during and since the 2008 crisis?

Austerity is a means of redistributing the profits in of productivity in which we all used to share to the world’s uber-wealthy.

The global financial crisis was one small step for man, one giant leap for the banking industry. It cemented financial crises as a permanent phenomenon and the formalisation of corporate revolution.

It signalled to the world that government exists only to support the private sector, triggering a wave of disillusionment which allowed neoliberalism to complete its task at hand: the complete and utter destruction of democracy, replacing it with a market society in which economics permeates every facet of modern life, from education to healthcare to law & order.

Even the military operates as a for-profit model, conveniently privatising any activity that sits outside the criminal justice system.

Some call the bail-outs of 2008 a failure of neo-liberalism. To the contrary, the private sector attained almost exactly what it set out to achieve: a system with no obligation to true economic recovery, that supports only profits and the corporations which generate them.

We keep voting for wealthy populist leaders thinking the knock-on-effects will put dollars in our pocket when the very opposite is true.

So long as voters continue to accept the mythic propaganda sown over the last 30 years that tax breaks & subsidies create jobs, deficits are bad, surpluses are good and that any instability is somehow the fault of the poor, our economic insecurity will only continue to increase.

Can you list some ‘baby steps’ out of the current economic mess?

A return to full employment.

A royal commission into the continuation of subprime mortgage fraud. (It didn’t go away after the GFC. In fact it was pretty much legalised).

Slash the cost of university degrees & create new pathways for the unemployed and underemployed to attain new skills and education.

Deficit spending to create infrastructure that will create the jobs of the future.

Support local agriculture.

Reduce private debt.

If you were a President / Prime Minister what would your first three pieces of policy be?

A job guarantee.
Re-introduce a price on carbon.
Legalise gay marriage.

Tell us something you have been wrong about?

I didn’t think that in 2017 that gay marriage and abortion would still be illegal in Australia.
Claire Connelly

Latest posts by Claire Connelly (see all)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *